982
edits
The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk: Difference between revisions
The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk (view source)
Revision as of 22:56, 28 February 2021
, 28 February 2021no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]." | <b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]." | ||
The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]]. | The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many visual and literary depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]]. | ||