The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk - Revision history

Ka-ess at 05:56, 1 March 2021

2021-03-01T05:56:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 28 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."		<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."

	The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many visual and literary depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical ~~libraries~~]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].		The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many visual and literary depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical]] libraries the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].

Ka-ess at 05:56, 1 March 2021

2021-03-01T05:56:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 28 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."		<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."

	The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].		The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many visual and literary depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].

Ka-ess at 05:53, 1 March 2021

2021-03-01T05:53:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 28 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct ~~writer~~ to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."		<b>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk</b> (full title, <i>The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature</i></b> is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct author to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."

	The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].		The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].

Ka-ess: Ka-ess moved page The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk, all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature to The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk

2021-03-01T05:53:13Z

Ka-ess moved page The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk, all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature to The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:53, 28 February 2021
(No difference)

Ka-ess: Created page with "The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk (full title, The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and..."

2021-03-01T05:52:56Z

Created page with "The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk (full title, The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and..."

New page
The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk (full title, The Divers Genitaliae of the Lizard-Folk; all Provocative and Discursive Notes and Diagrammes Left Compleat and Unexpurgated, with Novel Engravings of a both Titillating and Educational Nature is a biological codex traditionally attributed to [[First Cosmopolitan Age]] scholar [[Reptilicus]], although modern philologists generally believe that it was written by a distinct writer to whom they refer as "[[Pseudo-Reptilicus]]."

The codex was for many years treated as the authoritative source for mammalian [[humanoids]] on the [[Lizard People]] of the Hinter-fens. Although the document contains a great deal of useful and accurate medical and anthropological information about the Lizardfolk, its rather prurient editorial style and many depictions of the lizardkin mating process earned it a reputation as [[pornography]] among later, more conservative scholars. In [[magical]] and [[clerical libraries]] the book was typically relegated to a restricted section, granting it an almost mythical status as an erotic desideratum among young [[adepts]] and [[acolytes]].